Bilderberg.org Forum Index Bilderberg.org
the view from the top of the pyramid of power
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Paparazzi Statements not legal

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bilderberg.org Forum Index -> Diana, Princess of Wales - d. 31st August 1997
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
CJ
Suspended


Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 540
Location: London

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 11:07 pm    Post subject: Paparazzi Statements not legal Reply with quote

Paparazzi statements taken by French police are not legal!! Cool

Forgive me as I`m not a legal eagle. Because the paparazzi statements aren`t consistant with other witness accounts and the fact the paparazzi won`t give evidence at the inquest (why?)...means their statements are worthless!!! Fayed`s legal team would not have the opportunity to question statements which are already suspect Sad

As I understand it, Lord Justice Scott Baker was seeking a legal position where paparazzi statements could be read by the jury. Lord Justice Thomas was shocked that he couldn`t assist fellow Freemason Lord Justice Scott Baker in his move to use rigged evidence constructed during the paparazzi`s arrest period. Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy

Here`s the crunch, the gaping gap between paparazzi statements and statements taken from members of the public has resulted in a legal crisis. Cool

What we should now see is a suspension of the inquest and for Lord Justice Scott Baker to seek the re-arrest (for conspiracy to murder) and deportation of all the paparazzi involved.

The alternative would be to rely on only public INDEPENDENT statements...while this could be good news for those who believe Diana and Dodi were murdered, it would still remain a belief and the Royals, MI6 and the wider NWO would get away murder. Cool

These paparazzi gave their first interviews for the Channel 4 documentary "Witnesses in the Tunnel". They said they were 30 seconds behind Diana`s Mercedes...this is a blatant lie and they are only maintaining this position either from direct involvement, or because of SIS/NWO pressure...its strange that all paparazzi have received the same legal advice to stay away from the inquest...what are they hiding and who is advising them? Cool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
CJ
Suspended


Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 540
Location: London

PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lord Justice Scott Baker has lost his appeal to have paparazzi witness statements read out to the jury. Cool

This is good news for Fayed. Lord Justice Scott Baker could have these paparazzi re-arrested for manslaughter. More or less everyone now knows these paparazzi statements are a pack of lies. Maybe Fayed could force British police to re-arrest the paparazzi? Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bilderberg.org Forum Index -> Diana, Princess of Wales - d. 31st August 1997 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group