 |
Bilderberg.org the view from the top of the pyramid of power
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
CJ Suspended
Joined: 02 Aug 2006 Posts: 540 Location: London
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Guardian reports that NATO`s top brass have outlined their policy of pre-emptive nuclear stikes in a world of NWO assisted nuclear proliferation.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CJ Suspended
Joined: 02 Aug 2006 Posts: 540 Location: London
|
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stories abound about cut sea cables. so far about 3/4 cut, some say as many as 9 cut cables in the Middle East, from Suez to Sri lanker...about the length of the NWO front from Isreal to Pakistan. Many are suggesting this is a prelude to some sort of NWO action.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CJ Suspended
Joined: 02 Aug 2006 Posts: 540 Location: London
|
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
I hear the USS Cole is to be stationed off the Leboneas coast....why? Is this an omen?
There are stories on the internet suggesting senior military resignations, if the US attacks Iran...of course, these resignations are based on an unprovoked attack. But what would US generals do if Israel was off shore nuked....or the US suffers another NWO false flag terror attack on US soil?
The fact this propaganda is coming out, is an indication that anything is possible and while media talk says an attack is unlikely...all the military hardware is still in place. The loss of a Stealth Bomber is another possible indication that Stealth Bombers are being over worked....FOR WHAT???
In context, the Stealth is $1.2 billion per plane....and a Stealth can drop a nuke where is likes...if a nuke exploded over a ship off Lebanon....would you know....would you question the news, when they tell you the nuke was on the ship? The USS Cole was hit before.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
samuel
Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 78
|
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What could help china deal with high commodity price?
If a false-flag cannot then it is not the right time for a major one.
They need burma and sudan to calm down, they might believe there are risks that the west would ask for a share of oil-gaz to offset the price on public image of not doing anything. _________________ What is possible if you take into account the amount of cynism by the majority who vote? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CJ Suspended
Joined: 02 Aug 2006 Posts: 540 Location: London
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Admiral Willian Fallon head of US Central Command has resigned after one year of direct command in the Middle East.
Fallon expressed a direct counter opinion to the Bush neocon government, in the current edition of Esquire magazine. I might add that Esquire has published quite a few revealing artices.
Bush with just months to go (alledgedly), has sacked one of his senior men over the neocon war policy with Iran....
....it is clear that Fallon knows alot about US intentions towards Iran. The fact that Fallon gave Esquire this interview can be taken either way....but again, the only thing which stands out from Fallon`s sacking, is that all options on Iran are still on the table.
The next question is this, has Bush tried to act on Iran, but has found Fallon to be determined in his opposal to Bush`s Iran war plans.
Bush would only remove Fallon, if his replacement is willing to follow orders.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CJ Suspended
Joined: 02 Aug 2006 Posts: 540 Location: London
|
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Recently General Patraeus leader of coalition forces in Iraq and specifically responsible for failed Bush surge, has been questioned by US senators. The main point that Patraeus made was the alledged Iranian interferance in Iraq....Patraeus use an original term. He call those assisting alledged insurgents, "special groups". Patraeus laid it on very thick...its Iran stupid!
Days later, Iraq is bombed from one end to the other with 70 plus dead. One bomb on a bus had 700kg of explosive (ALLEDGEDLY)....
....but never mind the carnage, this is all very ordinary. The really big news is the fact that our MSM covered it and debated it so widely and just after General Patraeus read us his NWO message.
The next 7 months will be crucial. I really do believe anything is possible, and a nuke going off is at the top of the list.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CJ Suspended
Joined: 02 Aug 2006 Posts: 540 Location: London
|
Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Clinton bomb shell...
...Hilary has threatened to "obliterate" Iran, if Iran attacks Israel with nukes....but Iran is officially years away from having nukes, so why inflame the diplomatic process? As I`ve said in earlier posts in this thread, Iran has two nukes. I have already speculated a false flag attack, detonating a nuke on a ship off the Israeli coast...the nuke could be dropped on the ship and no one would know.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
samuel
Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 78
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CJ wrote: | Admiral Willian Fallon head of US Central Command has resigned after one year of direct command in the Middle East.
Fallon expressed a direct counter opinion to the Bush neocon government, in the current edition of Esquire magazine. I might add that Esquire has published quite a few revealing artices.
Bush with just months to go (alledgedly), has sacked one of his senior men over the neocon war policy with Iran....
....it is clear that Fallon knows alot about US intentions towards Iran. The fact that Fallon gave Esquire this interview can be taken either way....but again, the only thing which stands out from Fallon`s sacking, is that all options on Iran are still on the table.
The next question is this, has Bush tried to act on Iran, but has found Fallon to be determined in his opposal to Bush`s Iran war plans.
Bush would only remove Fallon, if his replacement is willing to follow orders.  |
This could also be used to put more pressure on iran and north korea, a kind of fake attack on pseudo-neutral military officials that don't comply with the fake possibility of an attack on iran.
I don't believe this risk mainly because china holds the power with its consumer consumption and sovereign wealth funds to stop the credit crisis from engulfing the whole financial architecture.
Aside from this china wants diplomacy to work to offset what could worsen the food-energy crisis, it would do so by increasing the demand for food from outside help (iran would then disrupt its transportation for military use only..which would worsen the food crisis in the region) and also energy transportation for a response to outside interference. _________________ What is possible if you take into account the amount of cynism by the majority who vote? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CJ Suspended
Joined: 02 Aug 2006 Posts: 540 Location: London
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
samuel; China might welcome a construct which would cut their population, even if it ment mass murder.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
samuel
Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 78
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CJ, it might be in the head of some top military or economic advisors to wait for a nuclear strike by america...
But we're just getting out of a period of extreme cynism and passivity.
What i read on the internet or at work is mixed (people are mad all the time and the rest are very resilient), which makes it too complicated to insure a massive scale attack gets done.
It would be extremely premature to conclude it is possible.
But still they may not be wise, paranoia and psychopathy remain sickness who makes you unable to see the big picture, they tend to focus on a part of the equation and dominate this only part, but then when things become intertwinned they lose control.
It is not the same as if a psychopath would kill people and remain outside of any interference. I believe there is too many things to consider to make it plausible.
it would then rely on an exceptionary confluence of event which would make people very curious and would lead to the arrest or killing of the perpetrators.
I may be wrong with my assumption, but it may mean my understanding of the mental illness creating mass murder is too simplistic, there is a belief among psychiatrist that there is 6 types of psychopathy...i may misunderstand some of them. _________________ What is possible if you take into account the amount of cynism by the majority who vote? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vicflame Committed Poster

Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 4507 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, well, well... Here comes someone again to REASSURE the people, so they don't move or protest, hey, Samuel ?
Let's not be naive, once again. One of the New World Order's main purposes is to create a MASSIVE DEPOPULATION.
For those who still don't believe in the fact that MANY rulers are sociopaths and or psychopaths, I recommend the reading of this book (which is downloadable on some peer-to-peer services ):
"Political Ponerology", by Andrew J. Lobaczewski
They WOULDN'T HESITATE to OBLITERATE an entire country. That's the murderous concept of "war of civilization", for you...
Let's remember that some members of the elite want a "cut" of 50 to 80% of the worlwide population ! This was accounted for times and times again.
So Clinton's vow to OBLITERATE Iran must be considered as a real danger. Let's remember that ALL of the US candidates (Clinton, Obama, Mc Cain, Huckabee) are sponsored by... the malevolent Council on Foreign Relations (a high instance of the NWO) !!!
Vic. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CJ Suspended
Joined: 02 Aug 2006 Posts: 540 Location: London
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Minor events can trigger vast global events. A simple play on words...Churchill started the Second World War by stating Britain would be at war with Germany, if Germany invaded Poland...if Hitler had already spoken to his military leaders, which is very likely, we sould take Churchill`s word as direct provocation...how would Hitler look if he`d u-turned after Churchill`s threat....
....remember, Churchill said this in public, there was no subtlety.
Obama has stated he would ""NUKE"" Pakistan if it made US people feel safe...Clinton has said she will "obliterate" Iran if Isreal is attacked with nukes. Now, I don`t expect you tp read through all my post in this thread, so I`ll say it again. I have an Irainian friend in London who was in the Iranian military, and he is 110% certain Iran has two nukes aquired from outside Iran. The NWO know this, now, if Isreal was attacked by a crude nuclear devivce off the Isreali coast, then Isreal would stike Iran almost instantly and then Iran would retaliate with its two nukes. Just one hit on Isreal would wipe it out....I should point out that the Isreali elite are nuke prepared, but the Israeli public are ripe for NWO sacrifice...the Muslim world will now be just like Germany and Japan is today...occupied and guilt ridden.
Israel is not the promised land and this quest has always been redefined through out history. There is olso a clear NWO policy of "sacrifice". The Lusitainia, Titanic, Tonkin, Kuwait, Pearl Harbour, Operation Northwoods and 9/11.
We could also put the slaughter of young European men in the First World War, in this context. Of course, there were many reasons for the First World War, but the under lying reason was fear of an uprising all over Europe. Industrialisation had led to a population explosion and food was thin on the ground. The masses were not happy....does this ring any bells today.
The reality is, we have a confluence of so many global aspects; depleting oil (real or not), global warming (real or not), the NWO crusade against the Muslim world, pouplation growth, rise of China and Asia, decline of US economy and the sham war on terror....all of these are coming together within what is a brief historical period of time. So anything is possible and this is the reason why I`m willing to speculate in order to second guess NWO constructs.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CJ Suspended
Joined: 02 Aug 2006 Posts: 540 Location: London
|
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
A third carrier group is about to move into the Gulf theater very soon, this will mean that there will three carrier groups in the Gulf at one time. Gates said this was just a normal transfer, but he went onto say this is a warning to Iran. Hard to know why it takes 3 days to switch carrier groups. This is definitely a period of concern.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CJ Suspended
Joined: 02 Aug 2006 Posts: 540 Location: London
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MI6 chief John Scarlett will visit Israel later this month and is expected to be briefed by Mossad head Mier Dagan. It is suggested that Dagan will provide Scarlett with new intelligence of Iran`s nuclear programme. This will be considered enough to justify an Isreali attack on Iran.
This was in todays Times and the fact that its getting a high profile release and that Scarlett is still a couple of weeks away from his Isreali visit, means there is more to this. Why would a British newspaper promote a visit to Israel by the head of MI6? Could it tie in with a terror strike on Israel?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
samuel
Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 78
|
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 4:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
vicflame wrote: | Well, well, well... Here comes someone again to REASSURE the people, so they don't move or protest, hey, Samuel ?
Let's not be naive, once again. One of the New World Order's main purposes is to create a MASSIVE DEPOPULATION.
For those who still don't believe in the fact that MANY rulers are sociopaths and or psychopaths, I recommend the reading of this book (which is downloadable on some peer-to-peer services ):
"Political Ponerology", by Andrew J. Lobaczewski
They WOULDN'T HESITATE to OBLITERATE an entire country. That's the murderous concept of "war of civilization", for you...
Let's remember that some members of the elite want a "cut" of 50 to 80% of the worlwide population ! This was accounted for times and times again.
So Clinton's vow to OBLITERATE Iran must be considered as a real danger. Let's remember that ALL of the US candidates (Clinton, Obama, Mc Cain, Huckabee) are sponsored by... the malevolent Council on Foreign Relations (a high instance of the NWO) !!!
Vic. |
I will take some time to study research on psychopathy based on the ponerology terminology.
I know a good one too, it gives a theory where there is sub-types of psychopathy.
The Psychopath: Theory, Research, and Practice by Hugues Herv (Editor), John C. Yuille (Editor)
Still, psychopaths are wise in their area of expertise but not so when it comes to being diversified, which is a big need in politics as well as in business.
It seems that the ponerology topics interest many people on the web, that's positive.
http://ponerology.blogspot.com/2008/04/political-ponerology-science-of-evil.html _________________ What is possible if you take into account the amount of cynism by the majority who vote? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|