Bilderberg.org

[CJ]

US Navy air-wing commander on the USS Kitty Hawk has been relieve from his post for loss of confidence. "The admiral`s mast" is a nonjudicial procedure below court martial....a spokeswoman said the action was not a punishment....which can only be interpreted as a "political decision". So why would a senior air-wing commander, who`s not that far from retirement, be removed from command?

It reminds me of one those old U-boat films, where the German crew live in fear of the resident SS officer. How many CIA officers are resident on the USS Kitty Hawk and how much hi tech snooping does crew the have to endure??

Maybe this officer was judged a risk. Maybe he spelt out his objections during obvious Iran training senarios? We can only speculate, but the timing is telling. Its not that long ago since Admiral Fallon was forced to resign, you can check back through this thread.

How safe is Obama?

[CJ]

Royal Dutch Shell and Repsol have backed out of a £5 billion Iranian gas pipline deal....I can`t think why?

[CJ]

Asia Times says Bush will attack Iran in August 2008. There are also rumblings in the US. Of course, this is likely disinformation date wise, but as I`ve said before, this period building upto the US election is key. McCain will make war, Obama and Clinton will withdraw from Iraq, of course, this is a lie.

Either way, Bush lights the fire before the election and leaves an inheritance. Or, the new president will be baptised in a font of NWO terror.

[CJ]

The Asia Times claims to have two sources for the August 2008 Iran strike. A former US Assistant Secretary of State and a US diplomat.

However, former US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton was talking yesterday (28th May) at The Hay Literary Festival in South Wales. Bolton said that there were only two options left. regime change, or force. Bloton went on to say that force was the least desirable option.

We will see alot of this counter statement stuff. One thing is certain, the US has not reduced its staggering military forces in the Middle East...these forces are over and above those deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan.

[CJ]

Today Obama spoke to the Jewish lobby saying that he would do "everything in his power to stop Iran aquiring nukes, EVERYTHING"!

So with total US political support, why would Bush wait? Olmert has also stated that Iran must be stopped.

[CJ]

Israel conducts long range test (900 miles) consisting of about 100 F15 and F16 aircraft. An Israeli official connected with the operation said the Iranians should "read the writing on the wall...This was a dress rehearsal and the Iranians should read the script before they continue with their programme for nuclear weapons. If diplomacy does not yield results, Israel will take military steps to halt Tehran`s production of bomb grade uranium".I was talking with an Arab yesterday, he believed that Iran has a nasty supprised for Israel. This supports what I have said before, that Iran has two nukes and the NWO knows this. Iranian nuke facilities are very well protected. It is likely that Israel will use advanced nuke armed bunker busting bombs and if not directly supplied by the US, the technology will be. This thread started with the premiss that this attack would take place in 2007. It takes a while to develope a shell which can deliver a nuke through 100ft of rock and concrete and only detonate when it arrives at the target. Of course, they might be using sub critical weapons. It is also interesting that this test mission flew over the Greek Islands....there are many islands which are uninhabited. Did Greace build a target on one of these islands so that Israel could test a nuke tipped weapon?

[CJ]

If conflict breaks out, Iran threatens to shut off Gulf shipping routes....days later US naval forces carryout drills designed to keep the oil flowing. Meanwhile, verious players turn up the heat while other throw iced water on the political posturing. On balance, the alternative news media are playing down the possibility of an attack. I would keep an open mind.

[CJ]

This morning BBC Today reported Iranian missile testing. The testing part is unremarkable. but the BBC made a big thing out of the fact that the Shahab-3 missile can hit Israel and most US bases in the region....

....do we hear the BBC spouting off that the US has four carrier groups menecing Iran? No, I thought not.

[CJ]

I keep hearing and reading that Israel and the US can`t attack Iran. Looking at the horizon, this looks to be correct, but who makes our horizon?

On 9/10, did you expect to see the WTC attacked on 9/11? Lets just imagin the US gives Iran a public ultimatum, "the US gives Iran 2 weeks to stop its nuclear programme, if this fails to happen, the US will be at war with Iran". Remember how the Second World War started? Churchill stated publically that "If Germany invades Poland, then Britain wil be at war with Germany"....how could Hitler not invade Poland? If Hitler had not invaded Poland, he would have lost respect from everyone. In reallity, Churchill started the Second World War.

The US demands that Iran stops its nuclear programme, or else.

So what I hear, read and see forms my horizon, but my perception tells me that events/constructs have a habit of popping up.

August is nearly here....its the silly month, we have Beijing and the next major event will be the US election. In my opinion, from now until Christmas is a period of very high risk.

[CJ]

Ok, its been a long time since I posted on this thread. I ruined many of my posts, because of underhand censorship and the staggering lack of direction on this forum...not to forget that many are NWO disinformation artists.lol

I have recently been banned from PROPAGANDAMATRIX (Prisonplanet/Infowars), this because I questioned their agenda. THEY are nothing but a NWO tool of disinformation. These sites do release information, like all double agents, but on balance, it is designed to control/restrict any sort of original thinking, anything which would break the NWO script.

The link below is about the latest US bunker buster. I have though about this and done some reading and if memory serves me right, I have already speculated on what I am about to say...maybe on this thread.

The MOP is a big mother....toooooo big, well, too big a warhead. Sure, they have tested penetrators which can go through a few 100ft of concrete and rock, but not with a warhead of that size. The reason why the MOP is so big, is that it needs to protect a micro nuke warhead.

You might remember a while back, about an underground test outside Las Vagas. This was supposed to be the largest conventional underground test ever...two things, they had to make it public, because it would be detected and another, by announcing it as a conventional test, no one would question the US`s word on this.

Of course, this was a micro nuke test and what I have just said, so upset PROPAGANDAMATRIX, that they moved my thread to a distant corner, I complained, they made excuses, I deleted some posts and I was banned.

It is difficult to know exactly, but I now believe that most alternative sites are run by the NWO and those that aren`t, are infected .

Tony Gosling is into 9/11 truth in a big way. I have appealed to him, but it falls on deaf ears.

You see, 9/11 truth is built on thermite and explosives...I am sure there were conventional bombs, but they were there for effect. But this is the NWO package, this is what "THEY" want you to believe.

To be continued.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jwIaLotSkaw29J0t9eD1EF7Ct8VQ