Bilderberg.org Forum Index Bilderberg.org
the view from the top of the pyramid of power
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Did U.S. Airmen Stop Cheney's Nuclear Provocation?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bilderberg.org Forum Index -> Global Totalitarian Superstate
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TonyGosling
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 1408
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, UK

PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 3:21 am    Post subject: Did U.S. Airmen Stop Cheney's Nuclear Provocation? Reply with quote

Dr Strangelove territory this. But no fiction. Four stories on the B52 missing nuke and deaths of those brave U.S. Airmen at Minot and Barksdale Air Force bases that may have just stopped a nuclear World War III breaking out. More investigative work needs doing on finding out for certain whether or not all six nukes are back in relatively safe hands.


ARTICLE ONE
Nukes Over America: All a Stupid Mistake. Sure It Was


http://rinf.com/alt-news/breaking-news/nukes-over-america-all-a-stupid-mistake-sure-it-was/1534/
http://www.thiscantbehappening.net/?q=node/50

The Air Force’s Friday report on the August 29-30 nuclear weapons incident which saw six armed cruise missiles flown across the continental US in launch position on a B-52H bomber leaves all the big questions unanswered, attempting to shuck the whole thing off as an “unacceptable mistake.”

To be sure, Air Force Secretary Michael W. Wynne and Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations Maj. Gen. Richard Newton, said that after a six-week investigation, five officers, including Col. Bruce Emig, commander of the Fifth Bomb Group at Minot AFB in North Dakota, where the flight originated, have been relieved of duty, and 65 other Air Force personnel were also removed from their duties, and both Barksdale and Minot were decertified for their strategic nuclear responsibilities. But that’s still pretty small beer for an incident so serious it’s never happened before in half a century of nuclear weapons handling.



There are, at this point, no court martials being contemplated, and nobody’s been discharged from the military.

Put simply, six 150-kiloton warheads were improperly attached to six Advanced Cruise Missiles, all loaded onto a wing launch pod, and then mounted on the wing of a B-52 H Stratofortress at Minot, along with six similar missiles with dummy warheads, which were loaded onto a launch pod on the plane’s other wing, an all 12 were improperly and illegally flown across the country to Barksdale AFB in Louisiana.

The Air Force, following its “investigation,” is saying the same thing it said before the investigation: it was all a big “mistake”—the result of “widespread disregard for the rules” regarding handling of nuclear weapons.



A few guys at Minot “inexplicably” screwed up and loaded the nukes and then there were a chain of mistakes because no one else treated the nuclear-tipped missiles as if they were armed with nuclear weapons.

The trouble with this theory, or story line if you will, is that while nobody at Minot, supposedly, noticed what was happening—even though ground crew workers spent eight hours laboring to get the pod with the six nuke-tipped missiles mounted on the plane’s wing. This despite the warheads are clearly visible and identifiable by the silver coating they exhibit when viewed through a little window in each nosecone cover, and because there are red coverings on the nuke nosecones—once the plane got to Barksdale, the ground crew there, which had no reason on earth to suspect it was looking at nuclear warheads, spotted them immediately upon going to the plane.
They had no reason to expect nukes because for 40 years it has been illegal for the military to carry nuclear weapons on bombers over US territory, and indeed since 1991, it has been illegal to even load nuclear weapons on a plane, period, even for training purposes on the ground..............................




ARTICLE TWO
Missing Nukes: Treason of the Highest Order

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7158
by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya
Global Research, October 29, 2007
Missing Nukes on August 29-30, 2007

According to a wide range of reports, several nuclear bombs were “lost” for 36 hours after taking off August 29/30, 2007 on a “cross-country journey” across the U.S., from U.S.A.F Base Minot in North Dakota to U.S.A.F. Base Barksdale in Louisiana. [1] Reportedly, in total there were six W80-1 nuclear warheads armed on AGM-129 Advanced Cruise Missiles (ACMs) that were “lost.” [2] The story was first reported by the Military Times, after military servicemen leaked the story.



It is also worth noting that on August 27, 2007, just days before the "lost" nukes incident, three B-52 Bombers were performing special missions under the direct authorization of General Moseley, the Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force. [3] The exercise was reported as being an aerial information and image gathering mission. The base at Minot is also home of the 91st Space Wings, a unit under the command of Air Force Space Command (AFSPC).

According to official reports, the U.S. Air Force pilots did not know that they were carrying weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). Once in Louisiana, they also left the nuclear weapons unsecured on the runway for several hours. [4]

U.S. Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, Plans, and Requirements, Major-General Richard Y. Newton III commented on the incident, saying there was an “unprecedented” series of procedural errors, which revealed “an erosion of adherence to weapons-handling standards” [5]

These statements are misleading. The lax security was not the result of procedural negligence within the U.S. Air Force, but rather the consequence of a deliberate tampering of these procedures.

If a soldier, marine, airman, or sailor were even to be issued a rifle and rifle magazine — weaponry of a far lesser significance, danger, and cost — there is a strict signing and accountability process that involves a chain of command and paperwork. This is part of the set of military checks and balances used by all the services within the U.S. Armed Forces.................................
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7158





ARTICLE THREE
speculations about the Minot incident, and call for investigation by a retired Naval officer

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_carol_wo_071009_speculations_about_t.htm
OpEdNews

Original Content at http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_carol_wo_071009_speculations_about_t.htm

October 9, 2007

speculations about the Minot incident, and call for investigation by a retired Naval officer

By Carol Wolman

The article below, by a retired Lieutenant Commander of the US Navy, demands a full, public investigation of the the B52 incident of late August. You may recall- if it hasn't gone down the memory hole- that some nuclear weapons were loaded onto a B52 bomber at Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota, "for decommissioning". They were then flown to to Barksdale AFB in Louisiana. This is against all the rules. Nuclear weapons are NEVER to be flown across the continent, for fear of accidents.

The chance that so many steps in the protocol of handling nuclear weapons would go wrong is miniscule, but if so, our tax dollars are being wasted, worse than wasted. We are funding idiots to guard bombs hundreds of times more powerful than the ones dropped on Japanese cities in 1945,



If the "mistake" was deliberate, it means that somehow the normal chain of command was bypassed. I've heard two theories about how this might have happened.

The first- the Chinese supplied key components of the computer systems that control our military command structure, and built in a "back door" route, by which they can override any orders in the system. They tricked the people at Minot and Barksdale with false orders, in order to demonstrate to the US military that orders cannot be trusted. This paralyzes the chain of command. They wanted to demonstrate their ability to do it in a peaceful way, so as to forestall an attack on Iran.

The other, more sinister theory is that Dick Cheney, who Bush put in charge of such things early on, has a separate override system which was in effect that day, and that all participants are sworn to secrecy. The cluster of violent deaths of young airmen and one woman from Minot and Barksdale AFB's from June-September- 6-7 young people in good health, and not in combat zones, makes one wonder........................................


Authors Website: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTowK03sr7Q

Authors Bio: Carol S. Wolman, MD is a psychiatrist in Northern California. A lifelong peace activist, she has written extensively on the psychology of our times. She is a cochair of Bay Area Impeach Bush-Cheney. You can join or form a local group at http://impeachbush.meetup.com/ She ran for Congress in '06, and is now a Gteen candidate for Congress in CA district 1. She is a coordinator of The New Broom Coalition, for a clean sweep of Congress...................
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_carol_wo_071009_speculations_about_t.htm



ARTICLE FOUR
Pentagon reels from second major nuclear arms blunder in a month

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=489958&in_page_id=1811

26/10/07 - World news section

Pentagon reels from second major nuclear arms blunder in a month

The Pentagon was reeling last night from the American military's second major nuclear weapons blunder in a month.

Congress is demanding a full scale investigation and serious questions are being asked about the competence of the officers in charge of the world's mightiest arsenal.

The latest outrage came as Commander Michael Portland, the officer in charge of the USS Hampton, the most advanced nuclear attack submarine in the world, was fired after it was discovered that he had neglected to make basic daily safety checks.

Last month 70 US airmen were demoted after they lost track of six nuclear-armed cruise missiles and allowed them to be flown halfway across America by a bomber crew that didn't even know they were there.

The Pentagon said that it had lost confidence in Commander Portland's leadership after checks showed that he had failed to analyse the chemical and radiological properties of the submarine's nuclear reactor for a month.

It is considered vital that the reactor's condition be fully examined every day so that any malfunction can be caught early.

If something went wrong with the reactor it could lead to a devastating nuclear accident.

The USS Hampton, currently docked in San Diego, is armed with nuclear torpedoes, nuclear cruise missiles and a massive mine-laying arsenal.

US Navy officials said that it had also been discovered that logs on the USS Hampton had been filled out to make it appear the daily checks of the reactor water had actually been done.

Members of Congress are furious about the latest scandal especially as it follows so closely after the nuclear missile debacle.

In that incident a large US Air Force team failed to remove the nuclear warheads from six cruise missiles being flown by a B-52 bomber from North Dakota to Louisiana.

It was described as one of the worst known breaches of nuclear weapons procedures ever.

The incident sparked a so-called "Bent Spear" nuclear alert, one step down in military terms from a "Broken Arrow".

A "Broken Arrow" is triggered if a nuclear missile has been lost or detonated in a way that does not create the risk of nuclear war. If the B-52 had crashed there would not have been a nuclear explosion but there could have been major plutonium leakage causing thousands of deaths.

Independent inquires are being launched into both the nuclear missile and the nuclear submarine incidents and Congress is planning hearings into the Pentagon's nuclear safety procedures.

An investigation is also underway into how the US Army came to accidentally fire a ground to air Patriot missile from a base in the Gulf Arab state of Qatar earlier this month.

The missile landed harmlessly in the desert but it could have brought down any aircraft in the vicinity and it has renewed charges in the Middle East that American soldiers can be trigger-happy and careless.

Find this story at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=489958&in_page_id=1811


















by the way

Kennebunkport Warning thread
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=11031



LIST OF KENNEBUNKPORT SIGNATORIES AND SUPPORTERS
http://www.actindependent.org/

The following is a list of individuals and/or organizations who have signed
or otherwise given their endorsement to The Kennebunkport Warning, on
and since August 24, 2007.
NOTE: Names will be added as they are received, the most recent first.
Endorsements should be sent via email to info@actindependent.org
Please put “KW” in subject line.
_____________________________________________________________
Last update: 10/19/07
BENJAMIN MERHAV, Melbourne, Australia
SAMUEL ANTHONY ETTARO, media producer & radio host
MARION LEONARD, Save Our World, Vermont
LYNN SANDAGE, Vermont
WANDA MCDONALD
MATT HOWARD, Iraq veteran, Vermont
ALI KHAGHANI
JAMES M. BUELS
MICHAEL MIDDLETON, The Geraldton 911 Time for the Truth Group,
Australia
JOSEPH THOMAS KELLEY, California
BRYAN OTTALINI, Georgia
911TRUTHSQUADS.ORG
ATLANTA911TRUTH.ORG
ROLF LINDGREN, Wisconsin
REBECCA L. WHITE, Maine
CHANNING BRECHLIN JR., Illinois
PETRUS VAN STADEN
KEN REINER
ALLAN RUBIN, Boston 9/11 Truth Committee
MATT SULLIVAN, Maryland
REV. PHILIP E. AND SUE K. WHEATON, Maryland
JOE AZAR, Virginia
MARCY POLLAN, Maryland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
CJ
Suspended


Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 540
Location: London

PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 3:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its all very interesting. How do 70 trained military personnel all make major mistakes on one mission???? Cool Why were these nukes slung under the wings of a B52? This being a clear break in orders which have stood for 40 years.

It is believed that a Patriot missile was fired at Tehran when Putin was visiting. Now I`ve not checked the range of the Patriot, or if it can carry a tactical nuke. But the article (link on my Iran thread) implied this missile was was armed with a nuke. Just after take off, the missile was destroyed and 3 crew who fired the weapon were executed.

It seems that there are verious plots afoot, which have the intention of deploying a nuke in the Middle East. No doubt some sort of false flag operation.

The other day I heard the BBC report that King Abdulla`s state visit took two years to plan....I wonder why this factoid was so important, are we supposed to believe all is well? Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bilderberg.org Forum Index -> Global Totalitarian Superstate All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group