|
Bilderberg.org the view from the top of the pyramid of power
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
TonyGosling Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jul 2006 Posts: 1415 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, UK
|
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:31 pm Post subject: Of Bilderberg and royal arch freemasons |
|
|
Quote: | The Apostles Creed
I believe in God, the Father almighty, creator of heaven and earth.
I believe in Yeshuah, Messiah, his only Son, our Lord.
He was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit and born of the Virgin Mary.
He suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried. On the third day he rose again.
He ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father. He will come again to judge the quick and the dead.
I believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy catholic Church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and the life everlasting. Amen.
http://freemasonrywatch.org/siteindex.html |
PEPIS#83 - Further Parliamentary Scrutiny of Bilderberg
From: Tony Gosling
Date: Fri, Jan 12 2007 11:36 pm
Well done again to Steve Watson for being one of the only journalists
in the world to pick up on Norman Baker's sporting second chance for
Tony Blair to tell the truth. In this short bulletin I'll be relating
some of my own experiences with crucial letters being 'spirited away'
in the post and with my own realisation that several lines of enquiry I
have been pursuing for the last ten years are, in fact, one and the
same.
A criminal hand revealed
I have been in touch with LibDem MP for Lewes Norman Baker over PM
Blair's Bilderberg denial last year in the House of Commons. As many
will know by now I visited Ayrshire just after the 1998 conference and
spoke to a woman who was working at the hotel.
She casually mentioned to me, with no prompting, that she'd served Tony
Blair his breakfast one morning during the conference, which strongly
suggests he was sleeping at the hotel and didn't just drop by for a
celebrity appearance. Blair was not on the semi-official attendance
list that year but his Defence Secretary George Robertson, who was
about to be made Secretary General of NATO, was.
http://www.bilderberg.org/1998.htm
In the first week in December 2006 Norman Baker's office at Portcullis
House opposite Parliament sent me a letter authorising me to
investigate Blair's presence or otherwise at the Turnberry meeting to
show that I was a bona fide journalist working for him. That letter
never arrived. His office sent me another letter, that didn't arrive
either. At this point I knew the post was being illegally intercepted
by someone either inside the House of Commons mail system or at the
Bristol area sorting office in Filton and that either Norman Baker's
phone and/or my own were being monitored. It is impossible to call
lying politicians to account when they have criminal collaberators who
listen in to telephone calls and have the power to destroy
communications between journalists and MPs at will.
I have informed Norman's office and filed a 'lost mail' complaint with
Royal Mail. Meanwhile the newish bilderberg.org forum was hacked
earlier today. What I am always interested in when something like this
happens is what was being discussed on the 'discussion libre' topic
that was deleted? In this case it was negotiations which are proceeding
with pope Benedict for the Roman Catholic Church to amalgamate with the
Protestant churches. It seems that Benedict - who I dubbed the
Diabolical pope for his ill-informed attacks on Islam - has been
listening closely to his two new Bilderberg advisers, Peter Sutherland
and Henry Kissinger on this one. The implication being that large
churches such as these need to be brought together to make them easier
for these totalitarians to control. One also wonders how much of the
catholic congregations' collection money is going to Kissinger and his
Associate?
The Andrew Palmer connection
People often ask me whether I have any proof that Bilderberg is
controlled by freemasons. The proof I do have is that the last
conference to take place in the UK was organised by one Andrew Palmer,
who was also Private Secretary to the world's number one freemason,
Grand Master of United Grand Lodge, the Duke of Kent.
http://www.bilderberg.org/1998.htm#palmer
So whatever precautions freemasons take to ensure that press and public
never find out whether or not they are freemasons, a tyrrany of the
mediocre. They are only in their public positions due to promotion and
privilege within 'the craft'. For those of you who don't know a lot
about freemasonry it is within the Royal Arch chapters that financially
and politically motivated freemasons congregate. Many masons are
unaware of the control-freakery of these higher degree masons who
really have convinced themselves that they are 'elite' superior beings
who can prey on ordinary members of the public with a clear concience.
How perfectly this dovetails in with Bilderberg. Which is a political
and economic global policy expression of that amoral elitism so
characteritic of Nazi Germany.
HRH Duke of Kent - official site
http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/Page5617.asp
HRH Duke of Kent's meteoric masonic rise: initiated 12th December 1963,
made Grand Master of United Grand Lodge 27th June 1967
First Grand Principal of the Supreme Grand Chapter of Royal Arch Masons
of England
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HRH_The_Duke_of_Kent
HRH Duke of Edinburgh initiated 5th December 1952 (Masonic Yearbooks)
Rare shots inside a Royal Arch temple
In November 2006 I went on a rare tour of Bristol's masonic hall in
Park street...
http://bristol.indymedia.org/newswire.php?story_id=25574Array&sc=1
...where I was amazed to see, in the royal arch temple, two giant
columns with domes on the top which I can only describe as phallic...
http://bristol.indymedia.org/attachments/nov2006/royalarch.jpg
...this wouldn't worry me so much if it wasn't for the fact that this
temple is modelled on a Jewish synagogue. It has the flags of the
twelve tribes of Israel and any orthodox Jew would recognise the layout
immediately. But no natural light is allowed in and the masons guiding
us round confessed to conducting ceremonies in there where only a
single candle lit the entire place. Quite spooky sounding and a
blasphemous travesty of Solomon's temple.
1591 - Tony Blair's alleged lodge
And these two issues have again come together with allegatons in the
Enigma TV dvd 'Illuminati Volume I' and elsewhere that Tony Blair is
himself a Royal Arch freemason and a member of 1591 United Studholme
Alliance Lodge which, according to my Masonic Yearbook, meets at No. 10
Duke Street St. James, LONDON SW1Y 6BS, on the 1st Wednesday in
February, the 3rd Wednesday in March, the 4th Wednesday in May and has
an installation meeting for new members on 3rd Wednesday in October.
1591's Royal Arch chapter meets on the 3rd Wednesday in January and May
as well as the 1st Wednesday in October. Last month I recorded and
interview with Russian television outside 'the other number ten' which
has a brass plate saying "Supreme Council, Ring Once". Some friendly
masons turned up while we were filming and so I asked them what the
Supreme Council was. They explained it was the headquaters of their
branch of advanced freemasonry which was the Rose-Croix, otherwise
known as Rosicrucians, who are one of the modern occult societies most
closely associated with the medieval Knights Templar, and said by some
to be identical to Weishaupt's Illuminati.
So you see, the hacking into my forum today and the theft of letters to
me from one of Britain's most astute MPs has prompted something rather
different. A call for Tony Blair to account for his masonic movements
at Turnberry and, rather closer to home, in London's elite district of
St. James. The tired old Blair puppet doesn't have long left on the
stage but how much better for him to be removed by the press, MPs and
by the people rather than one by the financial elite's two puppet
parties. Now back to Steve Watson's report.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
British MP Asking More Questions About Bilderberg
This time the next Prime Minister is the focus
Steve Watson
http://www.infowars.net/articles/january2007/110107Bilderberg.htm
Thursday, January 11, 2007
A British MP, who previously asked Prime Minister Tony Blair to reveal
details of any Bilderberg meetings he has attended, has now officially
asked the current Chancellor of the Exchequer, and most likely next
Prime Minister, to reveal details of his own attendances at Bilderberg.
Norman Baker, MP for Lewes, has officially requested that Gordon Brown
provide an oral or written answer to the following question:
Norman Baker (Lewes): To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, in which
years since 1997 (a) he and (b) other Treasury Ministers have attended
meetings of the Bilderberg Group.
The question has been officially submitted and it will now take a few
weeks before it is answered in the House of Commons.
Mr Baker previously asked Tony Blair the same question, to which Blair
answered "I have not attended any such meetings."
Blair may not have attended since he came to power but he certainly was
"groomed" by the secretive group, at the same time as Bill Clinton,
before either were elected into office.
It will be interesting to note Brown's answer given that he is known to
have attended the Bilderberg Conference when he was shadow Chancellor
of the Exchequer in 1991 and possibly again in 1995.
In a separate development, an answer has been provided to a question
about Bilderberg that was raised in the House of Lords:
Official Travel: Bilderberg Conference
Lord Stoddart of Swindon asked Her Majesty's Government:
Whether any Ministers attended the Bilderberg Conference in Ottawa
between 8 and 11 June; if so, whether they attended in a ministerial or
private capacity; whether they made contributions to debates; and, if
so, on which subjects.[HL7569]
Lord Bassam of Brighton answered: All ministerial visits are conducted
in accordance with the Ministerial Code and Travel by Ministers. Since
1999, the Government have published annually a list of overseas travel
by Cabinet Ministers costing over £500 and the total cost of all
ministerial travel. Information for 2005-06 was published on Monday 24
July 2006. Copies are available in the Library for the reference of
noble Lords. Information for 2006-07 will be published as soon as
possible after the end of the financial year. Information on other
Ministers' travel is not collected centrally.
There was no response indicating what subjects were discussed by said
ministers in attendance. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|