Bilderberg.org

[Caz]

Not far from Benjamin Franklin's house, where a number of bodies were found some years ago, (those felt to be responsible being members of the Royal Society of the Arts) is a network or corporations and charities who have an obssessive interest in children.

The video 'Ark and the Adam's Family' shows who is in this location, what their interests are, and where they network.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyqsOBkLWh0

[heronfisher]

This is something strange and it would make the things more worse if no-one deals with it in a serious manner . Many questions arises from the above posted statement and somebody needs to answer it.
_________________
iedge

[Caz]

Thanks for that sensible comment. You are right. At the moment we are doing our best to expose this nework. We see this as being the network centre for The Committee of 300. However, something else/more is required.

More here:

http://www.lifeinthemixtalk.com/?p=3305

[marektysis]

Is this permitted to be published by a foreigner?
Marek Tysis

MAREK,
Thank you so much for your support .The following extract from my site www.forced-adoption.com sums up the flaws and solutions to the problem of dysfunctional family courts;
IAN

Who are punished by the State when they have committed no crimes?? The ONLY people in the UK who suffer this injustice are parents whose children are taken away after so called "experts" make predictions of the future such as "risk of emotional abuse".Most mothers would receive better and fairer treatment from the court if they killed their children (and benefited from the protection of criminal procedure) rather than tangle with the cold ferocity that demolishes all those unfortunate parents who appear before the stern "establishment" judges sitting in our UK family courts.

Yes family courts should be criminal courts and children should only be taken from parents if they have committed or been charged with a crime.At the moment however babies are snatched at birth from perfectly innoffensive and law abiding parents for "risk of emotional abuse".This accusation is the social worker's"favourite"as it is quite impossible for parents to prove their innocence when so called "experts" predict what they might or might not do at some time in the future ! Incredibly,mothers lose their children to forced adoption not for anything they HAVE done but for what some overpaid charlatans (using a crystal ball ?) predict they might do ! No you couldn't make it up !

Yes it's punishment without crime !!

Even the actual family court proceedings are fatally flawed . Only too often parents resisting a local authority application for an interim care order are faced with reports from social workers and "experts" who do not come to court and so cannot be questioned.Barristers read these reports as though they are themselves witnesses and present these reports made by absent officials and experts as though they are "gospel truth" . When the parents contradict them with live evidence in court the hearsay evidence coming from the local authority barristers is nearly always preferred !Furthermore,when the local authority employs an "expert" to rule on parents' mental state,non accidental injury to a child,or parents' general parenting skills those parents are routinely refused by a judge the opportunity to call experts of their own to counter those "expert opinions" .The result is that parents are then faced with reports by these experts who rarely turn up in court to be questioned. The parents are then informed that they have no qualifications so when the local authority's expert says they are not fit parents,then that is the evidence that must be believed !

Disgracefully in our family courts all the rules of evidence are casually "thrown out of the window". SHAME on our family court legal system and all those who support it !